<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Metal Gear Solid 4 is the Worst Best Game Ever</title>
	<atom:link href="http://asiangirlgamer.com/339/metal-gear-solid-4-is-the-worst-best-game-ever/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://asiangirlgamer.com/339/metal-gear-solid-4-is-the-worst-best-game-ever/</link>
	<description>Thoughtful Opinions about Games, Culture, and People</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 Jun 2010 05:07:44 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Name (not required)</title>
		<link>http://asiangirlgamer.com/339/metal-gear-solid-4-is-the-worst-best-game-ever/comment-page-1/#comment-2603</link>
		<dc:creator>Name (not required)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jun 2010 08:20:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asiangirlgamer.com/?p=339#comment-2603</guid>
		<description>God this article was a bashfest. You even took a shot at Uncharted using bad analogies along the way! The plot was MASTERFULLY crafted, and included all of the past MGS games to an equal extent IMO. I can understand you not liking 2 (IMO its the worst in the series, still a 4/5 though for the final quarter of the game). MGS4 is not a SEQUEL to 2; you&#039;re confused. It just happens after the events of 2. Plot has more references than connections with 2. Obviously you like a plot that is closer to real life. You seem disgusted, almost frightened at the thought of a game that would use technology to describe what would usually be magic, or supernatural. Or maybe you don&#039;t have the patience to be immersed into the world of MGS, which is as deep as star wars IMO. The people, events, and organizations all include things that could actually happen, or exist. Us MGS fans love 3 and 1, and KNOW that they are the most approachable in the series to a non-fan. Consider yourself a non-fan. You just prove our point is all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>God this article was a bashfest. You even took a shot at Uncharted using bad analogies along the way! The plot was MASTERFULLY crafted, and included all of the past MGS games to an equal extent IMO. I can understand you not liking 2 (IMO its the worst in the series, still a 4/5 though for the final quarter of the game). MGS4 is not a SEQUEL to 2; you&#8217;re confused. It just happens after the events of 2. Plot has more references than connections with 2. Obviously you like a plot that is closer to real life. You seem disgusted, almost frightened at the thought of a game that would use technology to describe what would usually be magic, or supernatural. Or maybe you don&#8217;t have the patience to be immersed into the world of MGS, which is as deep as star wars IMO. The people, events, and organizations all include things that could actually happen, or exist. Us MGS fans love 3 and 1, and KNOW that they are the most approachable in the series to a non-fan. Consider yourself a non-fan. You just prove our point is all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
